On 11/06/2012 10:43:19 AM, Micha Nelissen wrote:
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
>> Hmm I guess there is no simple solution then, since the "recover"
>> function also prints the kernel messages about the machine check
>> being in kernel mode without having checked whether it rea
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
>> Hmm I guess there is no simple solution then, since the "recover"
>> function also prints the kernel messages about the machine check
>> being in kernel mode without having checked whether it really was in
>> kernel mode. In the past the user mod
On 11/06/2012 03:21:37 AM, Micha Nelissen wrote:
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > Therefore I request to put this check back, and even to put the
> > removed code at the top of the machine check handler because
there is
> > no point in trying to recover from a user space b
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
> > Therefore I request to put this check back, and even to put the
> > removed code at the top of the machine check handler because there is
> > no point in trying to recover from a user space bus error anyway.
>
> Why is there no point trying to
On 11/02/2012 06:48:40 AM, Martijn de Gouw wrote:
Hi,
The following commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=commit;h=e49b1fae0ba4d06b29bd753a961abb447566bf4a
causes confusion, because it prints "Machine check in kernel mode"
also when the bus error is actu
