Re: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-10 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Prodyut Hazarika wrote: > > > Do you know the reason why these drivers were removed? Also, are there > > > plans to get these drivers back? Please let me know. > > > > Perhaps they are in the DENX kernel? If so, someone would need to submit > > them for inclusion. >

RE: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-10 Thread Prodyut Hazarika
Hi Josh, > > Do you know the reason why these drivers were removed? Also, are there > > plans to get these drivers back? > > Please let me know. > Perhaps they are in the DENX kernel? If so, someone would need to submit > them for inclusion. Yes those drivers were in the Denx kernel. I was in

Re: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:47:48 -0700 "Prodyut Hazarika" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Josh, > I have few questions. > > > > Should I base my patch from your master branch or your 'next' branch? > > The 'next' branch would be best. > > I saw that both your master and next branches have removed th

RE: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-10 Thread Prodyut Hazarika
Hi Josh, I have few questions. > > Should I base my patch from your master branch or your 'next' branch? > The 'next' branch would be best. I saw that both your master and next branches have removed the 4xx dma and USB drivers. The dma drivers for 4xx used to under: drivers/dma/ppc440spe-adma.c

RE: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-09 Thread Prodyut Hazarika
Hi Josh, Thanks for your reply. > That was a bit old and I've updated it now to match the overallpowerpc.git > tree master branch Thanks. I can see the changes now. > Generally, if you track my 'next' branch that is what will be most current > for 4xxjosh Should I base my patch from your master

Re: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-08 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:42:33 -0700 "Prodyut Hazarika" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Josh, > Thanks for your reply. > > > That was a bit old and I've updated it now to match the overallpowerpc.git > > tree master branch > Thanks. I can see the changes now. > > > Generally, if you track my 'next

Re: Question on 4xx GIT tree

2008-09-08 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:55:26 -0700 "Prodyut Hazarika" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Josh, > I am planning to submit a patch to support 4K/16K and 64K page size for 4xx > processors. > I see that your git tree still has the include/asm-powerpc/* header files, > while in Linus's git tree, the pow