RE: PCI Resource allocation

2008-12-07 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 18:12 -0600, Flores, Raul wrote: > A bit off topic, but since the subject is pci resource allocation: > > As entered here: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249832 > > the 2.6.24-gentoo-r3 kernel; iomem tree for my video display works, but > has not worked in the foll

Re: PCI Resource allocation

2008-12-04 Thread Deepak Pandian
Hi Ben, On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 00:06 +0530, Deepak Pandian wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In ppc4xx_pci i see the pci size to be declared as >> u32 lah, lal, pciah, pcial, sa; > > I think the 4xx code is pretty much ok at thi

RE: PCI Resource allocation

2008-12-04 Thread Flores, Raul
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Herrenschmidt Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 4:54 PM To: Deepak Pandian Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: PCI Resource allocation On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 00:06 +0530, Deepak Pandian wrote: > Hi, > > In ppc

Re: PCI Resource allocation

2008-12-04 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 00:06 +0530, Deepak Pandian wrote: > Hi, > > In ppc4xx_pci i see the pci size to be declared as > u32 lah, lal, pciah, pcial, sa; I think the 4xx code is pretty much ok at this stage no ? > Also at many other places I see the pci region is not capable of > handling resourc