Development
>Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ causing poor console responsiveness
>
>On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:54 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> I'm adding support for a new e500-based board (the P1022DS), and in
>> the process I've discovered that enabling CONFIG_NO_HZ (Ti
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:54 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> I'm adding support for a new e500-based board (the P1022DS), and in
> the process I've discovered that enabling CONFIG_NO_HZ (Tickless
> System / Dynamic Ticks) causes significant responsiveness problems on
> the serial console. When I type on
On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:46 PM, "Mike Galbraith" wrote:
>
> Hi Timur,
>
> This has already fixed. Below is the final fix from tip.
Than Mike. I thought I was using the latest code, but I guess not.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozla
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 16:55 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > I'm adding support for a new e500-based board (the P1022DS), and in
> > the process I've discovered that enabling CONFIG_NO_HZ (Tickless
> > System / Dynamic Ticks) causes significant resp
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> I'm adding support for a new e500-based board (the P1022DS), and in
> the process I've discovered that enabling CONFIG_NO_HZ (Tickless
> System / Dynamic Ticks) causes significant responsiveness problems on
> the serial console. When I type on
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:54:17PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> I'm adding support for a new e500-based board (the P1022DS), and in
> the process I've discovered that enabling CONFIG_NO_HZ (Tickless
> System / Dynamic Ticks) causes significant responsiveness problems on
> the serial console. When I