On 05/11/2013 03:39 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 10.05.2013 um 21:22 schrieb Scott Wood :
On 05/10/2013 12:57:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you guys please collect performance data during the next weeks on both
guest-directed ISIs as well as VF MMIOs (preferably with in-kernel MMIO), s
Am 10.05.2013 um 21:22 schrieb Scott Wood :
> On 05/10/2013 12:57:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Could you guys please collect performance data during the next weeks on both
>> guest-directed ISIs as well as VF MMIOs (preferably with in-kernel MMIO), so
>> that we can decide on the direction
On 05/10/2013 12:57:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you guys please collect performance data during the next weeks
on both guest-directed ISIs as well as VF MMIOs (preferably with
in-kernel MMIO), so that we can decide on the direction that's worth
going towards?
Collecting data on VF M
ists.ozlabs.org; ag...@suse.de; kvm-
>> p...@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to
>> Guest
>>
>> On 05/09/2013 07:34 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
>>>>>> VF stands f
> Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to
> Guest
>
> On 05/09/2013 07:34 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
> >>>> VF stands for virtualization fault see MAS8[VF] and we may use it
> for
> >> virtualized
> >>
On 05/09/2013 07:34 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
VF stands for virtualization fault see MAS8[VF] and we may use it for
virtualized
Looks KVM PPC have no this mechanism currently since I don't find MAS8_VF
is
used in kernel, right?
Yes but 'we may use it' in the feature, I have a fu
> >> VF stands for virtualization fault see MAS8[VF] and we may use it for
> virtualized
>
> Looks KVM PPC have no this mechanism currently since I don't find MAS8_VF
> is
> used in kernel, right?
Yes but 'we may use it' in the feature, I have a functional POC with VF.
Now we capture virtualized
...@suse.de; kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to
Guest
On 05/08/2013 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like
On 05/07/2013 08:53:50 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
On 05/08/2013 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like DSI.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_emulate.c |3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c
...@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to
Guest
On 05/08/2013 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like DSI.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen
.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to
> Guest
>
> On 05/08/2013 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> >> We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like DSI.
> >>
> &g
On 05/08/2013 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like DSI.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_emulate.c |3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c|3 ++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
On 05/07/2013 06:06:30 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
We also can direct ISI exception to Guest like DSI.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_emulate.c |3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c|3 ++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Are you seeing a real per
13 matches
Mail list logo
