On Wednesday 15 March 2017 05:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:20:15PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
I see no implementation; so why are you poking at it.
Maddy has posted an implementation of the kernel part for powerpc in
patch 2 of this series, but maybe you're not
On Wednesday 15 March 2017 11:50 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Peter,
Peter Zijlstra writes:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:31:51PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
Huh? PPC hasn't yet implemented this? Then why are you fixing it?
yes, PPC hasn't implemented this (until now).
until now whe
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:20:15PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > I see no implementation; so why are you poking at it.
>
> Maddy has posted an implementation of the kernel part for powerpc in
> patch 2 of this series, but maybe you're not on Cc?
I am not indeed. That and a completely inadeq
Hi Peter,
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:31:51PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>> >Huh? PPC hasn't yet implemented this? Then why are you fixing it?
>>
>> yes, PPC hasn't implemented this (until now).
>
> until now where?
On powerpc there is currently no kernel suppor
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:31:51PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> >Huh? PPC hasn't yet implemented this? Then why are you fixing it?
>
> yes, PPC hasn't implemented this (until now).
until now where?
> And did not understand "Then why are you fixing it?"
I see no implementation; so why ar
On Monday 13 March 2017 06:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:45:51PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
- should you not have fixed this in the tool only? This patch
effectively breaks ABI on big-endian architectures.
IIUC, we are the first BE user for this feature
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:45:51PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > - should you not have fixed this in the tool only? This patch
> >effectively breaks ABI on big-endian architectures.
>
> IIUC, we are the first BE user for this feature
> (Kindly correct me if I am wrong), so technically
On Tuesday 07 March 2017 03:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:28:17PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Monday 06 March 2017 04:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:13:08PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
perf_mem_dat
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:28:17PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 06 March 2017 04:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:13:08PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> >>From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> >>
> >>perf_mem_data_src is an union that is initialized via
On Monday 06 March 2017 04:52 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:13:08PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
perf_mem_data_src is an union that is initialized via the ->val field
and accessed via the bitmap fields. For this to work on big endian
plat
ov; Ingo Molnar; Stephane Eranian; Sukadev Bhattiprolu;
> > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/perf: Define big-endian version of
> > perf_mem_data_src
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:13:08PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
; Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/perf: Define big-endian version of
> perf_mem_data_src
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:13:08PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> >
> > perf_mem_data_src is an union that is initialized via the ->va
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:13:08PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
>
> perf_mem_data_src is an union that is initialized via the ->val field
> and accessed via the bitmap fields. For this to work on big endian
> platforms, we also need a big-endian represenation of p
13 matches
Mail list logo
