> >
> > Thanks for your input. I think the name "fsl,MPIC-MSI" and
> > "fsl,IPIC-MSI"
> > is somethind specific.
>
> This is the third MSI-on-MPIC I've seen, and I doubt it will
> be the last. It is likely FSL will make some different one
> in the future, as well.
>
This is the first patch f
+- compatible : should be "fsl,MPIC-MSI" for 85xx/86xx cpu,
+ and "fsl,IPIC-MSI" for 83xx cpu.
Please use a more specific name, "fsl,8599-msi" or similar?
Thanks for your input. I think the name "fsl,MPIC-MSI" and
"fsl,IPIC-MSI"
is somethind specific.
This is the third MSI-on-MPIC
>
> > +- compatible : should be "fsl,MPIC-MSI" for 85xx/86xx cpu,
> > + and "fsl,IPIC-MSI" for 83xx cpu.
>
> Please use a more specific name, "fsl,8599-msi" or similar?
>
Thanks for your input. I think the name "fsl,MPIC-MSI" and
"fsl,IPIC-MSI"
is somethind specific. Actually, from th
+- compatible : should be "fsl,MPIC-MSI" for 85xx/86xx cpu,
+ and "fsl,IPIC-MSI" for 83xx cpu.
Please use a more specific name, "fsl,8599-msi" or similar?
+- interrupts : should contain the msi interrupts cascade to the
host
+ interrupt controller.
You should describe that