> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 8:34 AM
> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> Cc: Wang Haiying-R54964; j...@8bytes.org; iommu@lists.linux-
> foundation.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/fsl_pamu: u
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 20:42 -0600, Varun Sethi wrote:
> For the DSP case again we have to set up the stash attribute. Are you saying
> that this should be a separate attribute?
Not necessarily a separate attribute, but there should be some way to
distinguish whether you're providing a Linux cpu n
j...@8bytes.org; iommu@lists.linux-
> foundation.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/fsl_pamu: use physical cpu index to find the
> matched cpu nodes
>
> On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 21:16 -0600, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote:
> > Haiying/Scott,
> > Forg
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 21:16 -0600, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote:
> Haiying/Scott,
> Forgot to mention this, the PAMU driver has to handle stash destination
> settings both for power and dsp cores (on B4 platform). For the dsp
> cores we would expect the physical core id (not controlled by Linux).
> To
Sethi Varun-B16395
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/fsl_pamu: use physical cpu index to find the
> matched cpu nodes
>
> On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 14:30 -0500, Haiying Wang wrote:
> > In the case we miss to bring up some cpus, we need to make sure we can
> > find the correct cpu n
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 14:30 -0500, Haiying Wang wrote:
> In the case we miss to bring up some cpus, we need to make sure we can
> find the correct cpu nodes in the device tree based on the given logical
> cpu index from the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang
> ---
> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
