Re: [PATCH] define binding for fsl mpic interrupt controllers

2011-01-19 Thread Meador Inge
On 01/18/2011 01:47 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: I'm not sure a complete merge into one binding makes sense. The thing that motivated creating this new binding with 4 cells was a thread from last year. See: http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2010-January/001489.html I ag

RE: [PATCH] define binding for fsl mpic interrupt controllers

2011-01-18 Thread Yoder Stuart-B08248
> -Original Message- > From: Meador Inge [mailto:meador_i...@mentor.com] > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 7:21 PM > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; > Blanchard, Hollis; Meador Inge > Subject: Re: [PATC

Re: [PATCH] define binding for fsl mpic interrupt controllers

2011-01-17 Thread Meador Inge
Hi Stuart, From: Stuart Yoder define the binding for compatible = "fsl,mpic", including the definition of 4-cell interrupt specifiers. The 3rd and 4th cells are needed to define additional types of interrupt source outside the "normal" external and internal interrupts in FSL SoCs. Define erro