On Wednesday 26 March 2008 09:31, Sergej Stepanov wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 25.03.2008, 17:32 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
>
> > Do you have any opinion about the proposed patch ?
> >
>
> I have to say, it could be some off-topic.
> But if you would use the cpm_uart-driver for cpm2(or cpm1
Am Dienstag, den 25.03.2008, 17:32 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> Do you have any opinion about the proposed patch ?
>
I have to say, it could be some off-topic.
But if you would use the cpm_uart-driver for cpm2(or cpm1) as kernel
module, at linking you can get warnings about:
- cpm_
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:27, Rune Torgersen wrote:
>>> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:03, Scott Wood wrote:
Yes, I've answered questions on the lists from at least one person
using a custom board with cpm2 smc.
>>>
>>> Are you sure it
On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:27, Rune Torgersen wrote:
> >Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:03, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> Yes, I've answered questions on the lists from at least one person
> >> using a custom board with cpm2 smc.
> >
> > Are you sure it wasn't me ? ;-)
> >
>
>
>Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 17:03, Scott Wood wrote:
>> Yes, I've answered questions on the lists from at least one person
>> using a custom board with cpm2 smc.
>
> Are you sure it wasn't me ? ;-)
>
Probably me, actually. We have a 8280 with SMC's in use (SMC1 and 2)
___
