On 02/24/2016 02:37 AM, Hugh Dickins via Linuxppc-dev wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:45:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> Not able to understand the first code block of follow_page_mask
>>> function. follow_huge_addr function is expected
On 02/23/2016 07:33 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:45:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Not able to understand the first code block of follow_page_mask
>> function. follow_huge_addr function is expected to find the page
>> struct for the given address if it turns o
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:45:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > Not able to understand the first code block of follow_page_mask
> > function. follow_huge_addr function is expected to find the page
> > struct for the given address if it turns o
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:45:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Not able to understand the first code block of follow_page_mask
> function. follow_huge_addr function is expected to find the page
> struct for the given address if it turns out to be a HugeTLB page
> but then when it finds the pa
Not able to understand the first code block of follow_page_mask
function. follow_huge_addr function is expected to find the page
struct for the given address if it turns out to be a HugeTLB page
but then when it finds the page we bug on if it had been called
with FOLL_GET flag.
page = foll
