On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:26 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Scott,
>
> On 27 January 2016 at 15:41, Alessio Igor Bogani
> wrote:
> > Scott,
> >
> > On 27 January 2016 at 15:27, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +
Scott,
On 27 January 2016 at 15:41, Alessio Igor Bogani
wrote:
> Scott,
>
> On 27 January 2016 at 15:27, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> [...]
>>> > I'm wondering if we are allowed to pu
Scott,
On 27 January 2016 at 15:27, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
[...]
>> > I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
>> > 86xx base systems
[...]
>> > mpc86xx_
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> > Hi Kumar,
> >
> > I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
> > 86xx base systems (gef_ppc9a_defconfig, gef_sbc310_defconfig,
> > gef_sbc610_defconfi
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
> 86xx base systems (gef_ppc9a_defconfig, gef_sbc310_defconfig,
> gef_sbc610_defconfig, mpc8610_hpcd_defconfig, mpc8641_hpcn_defconfig
> and sbc8641d_
Hi Kumar,
I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
86xx base systems (gef_ppc9a_defconfig, gef_sbc310_defconfig,
gef_sbc610_defconfig, mpc8610_hpcd_defconfig, mpc8641_hpcn_defconfig
and sbc8641d_defconfig) into the
mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like alread
