Subject: FW: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
Hello Felix
We checked with the Board designer, we need the board fixes "mentioned in
Board errata doc" on the board for this issue. Sorry for the confusion.
The fixes are not present on RevC, also on some RevDs this fix also may
Added Linxppc-dev
> -Original Message-
> From: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 11:47 AM
> To: Felix Radensky
> Cc: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579; leon.woestenb...@gmail.com
> Subject: FW: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hello Felix
Felix,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Felix Radensky wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 07:05 AM, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
>> As such there is no hardware fix related to this issue between RevC to
>> RevD. The solution was a software patch to resolve the issue related to
>> IRQ0.
>
> Are you sure ? Ple
al Poonam-B10812
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Gupta Maneesh-B18878; Kushwaha Prabhakar-
> B32579
> Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hi Poonam
>
> On 04/12/2011 07:05 AM, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
> > Hello Felix
> >
> >
: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
Hi Prabhakar,
On 04/11/2011 02:09 PM, Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579 wrote:
Hi,
Yes. It wil be applicable for all revisions.
Regards,
Prabhakar
I'm sure this is applicable to all revisions, but it doesn't necessarily
makes things work. The pr
Hi,
On 04/12/2011 07:35 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 04:05 +, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
May be you can look at
http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-mini-PCI-E-slot-on-P2020RDB-td26802038.html
Felix we do not have the atheros driver for 2.6.38 and the issue is
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 04:05 +, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
> May be you can look at
> http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-mini-PCI-E-slot-on-P2020RDB-td26802038.html
>
> Felix we do not have the atheros driver for 2.6.38 and the issue is
> only seen with Atheros not sata_sil.
Hello Felix
Please find some comments inline.
Regards
Poonam
> -Original Message-
> From: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:26 AM
> To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Subject: FW: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
>
>
> -O
elix Radensky [mailto:fe...@embedded-sol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 2:10 PM
To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
Cc: Fabian Bertholm; Leon Woestenberg; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Mahajan
Vivek-B08308; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Gupta Maneesh-B18878
Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
Hi
-...@ozlabs.org; Mahajan
> Vivek-B08308; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Gupta Maneesh-B18878
> Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hi,
>
> Assuming I have all patches in place, will this problem be resolved on
> earlier board revisions (before rev D) ?
>
> Fe
: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:53 PM
To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
Cc: Leon Woestenberg; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Mahajan Vivek-B08308;
Felix Radensky; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Gupta Maneesh-B18878
Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
Hello Kushwaha Prabhakar,
Our impression is that there
onam-B10812; Gupta Maneesh-B18878
> Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hello Kushwaha Prabhakar,
>
> Our impression is that there is the same issue on the P1020/P1011 RDB.
> Can you confirm this?
>
> Best Regards,
> Fabe
>
>
> 2011/4/8
>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:50 PM
>> To: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
>> Cc: Kumar Gala; Mahajan Vivek-B08308; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Felix
>> Radensky; Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
>> Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>>
>> Hello,
>
ect: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Felix Radensky
> wrote:
> > Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
> >>>> Thanks a lot. If I understand you cor
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Felix Radensky wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
Thanks a lot. If I understand you correctly, the only way I can get
ath9k driver to work on this board using legacy interrupts is to wait for a
>
Hi, Kumar
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
Thanks a lot. If I understand you correctly, the only way I
can get ath9k driver to work on this board using legacy
interrupts is to wait for a hardware fix. Right ?
Correct
I'm confused. Wh
On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot. If I understand you correctly, the only way I
>> can get ath9k driver to work on this board using legacy
>> interrupts is to wait for a hardware fix. Right ?
>
> Correct
I'm confused. What's the issue with IRQ0 on
> From: Felix Radensky [mailto:fe...@embedded-sol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:26 PM
> >
> Yes, I've enabled that bit, but didn't get any interrupt.
Thanks for trying.
>
> Thanks a lot. If I understand you correctly, the only way I
> can get ath9k driver to work on this board us
Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
From:
linuxppc-dev-bounces+vivek.mahajan=freescale@lists.ozlabs.
org
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+vivek.mahajan=freescale@lists
.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Felix Radensky
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:52 PM
I just noticed a MSI enable bit in
driver
> From:
> linuxppc-dev-bounces+vivek.mahajan=freescale@lists.ozlabs.
> org
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+vivek.mahajan=freescale@lists
> .ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Felix Radensky
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:52 PM
> >
> > I just noticed a MSI enable bit in
> > drivers/net/wirel
Hi,
Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
I've enabled MSI in ath9k driver, by simply adding
pci_enable_msi() and
pci_disable_msi() at relevant places. The MSI interrupt is allocated.
irq: irq 0 on host /s...@ffe0/m...@41600 mapped to virtual irq 18
phy0: Atheros AR9280 MAC/BB Rev:2 AR5133 RF Rev:
> From: Felix Radensky [mailto:fe...@embedded-sol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:30 PM
> > As per the p2020rm, PCIe legacy INTA is shared with IRQ0 for this
> > ctlr, which is the exactly the case with other SoC's p2020ds,
> > mpc8536ds, mpc8572ds. To me it seems like a board issue
Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
From: Felix Radensky [mailto:fe...@embedded-sol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 2:56 PM
To: Mahajan Vivek-B08308
Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Kumar Gala
Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
Hi,
Looks like INTA is
> From: Felix Radensky [mailto:fe...@embedded-sol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 2:56 PM
> To: Mahajan Vivek-B08308
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Kumar Gala
> Subject: Re: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hi,
> >
>
Hi,
Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use mini-PCI-E WLAN card on P2020RDB running
2.6.32, but so far without success.
ath9k driver identifies the device, I can run ifconfig,
iwconfig and hostapd on wlan0, but device is not getting any
interrupts, so I suspect the interrupt co
nuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Aggrwal Poonam-B10812; Kumar Gala
> Subject: Problem with mini-PCI-E slot on P2020RDB
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use mini-PCI-E WLAN card on P2020RDB running
> 2.6.32, but so far without success.
> ath9k driver identifies the device, I can run ifconfig,
Hi,
I'm trying to use mini-PCI-E WLAN card on P2020RDB running 2.6.32, but
so far without success.
ath9k driver identifies the device, I can run ifconfig, iwconfig and
hostapd on wlan0, but device is not
getting any interrupts, so I suspect the interrupt configuration is
wrong. Atheros ath9k
27 matches
Mail list logo
