Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: Problem of PowerPc 82xx when using smc
>
>> Newer kernels support dynamically allocating this parameter RAM. Older
>> kernels use whatever u-boot chose.
>>
>> Why do you want to set it to a particular address?
&g
y are you mucking about with this tooth at
all? , tooth works well on everyone's mouth, boys and girls as well"
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Thomas"
To: "hellohello"
Cc: "Scott Wood" ;
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 7:20 PM
Subject
"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: Problem of PowerPc 82xx when using smc
> On 05/20/2010 10:33 PM, hellohello wrote:
>>> No, it shouldn't -- rx_bd_base is of type "cbd_t *", so the multiplication
>>> already happens as part of
On 05/20/2010 10:33 PM, hellohello wrote:
No, it shouldn't -- rx_bd_base is of type "cbd_t *", so the multiplication
already happens as part of pointer arithmetic.
---Yes, you are right. I made a basic mistake.
But now I have another question.
The SMC1 params can be relocated to any offset of t
tform I've ever used, 8xx and 8xxx as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Wood"
To: "hellohello"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: Problem of PowerPc 82xx when using smc
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:58:27PM +0800, hellohello wrote:
I f
this code in neither
cpm_uart_cpm2.c nor cpm_uart_core.c.
Should I add these code to cpm_uart_core.c?
--dp_mem = cpm_dpram_addr(0x87fc);
--out_be16(dp_mem, SMC1_BASE);
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Wood"
To: "hellohello"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:0
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:58:27PM +0800, hellohello wrote:
>
> I find a problem in
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c:
> int cpm_uart_allocbuf(struct uart_cpm_port *pinfo, unsigned int is_con)
> {
> ... ...
> pinfo->tx_bd_base = pinfo->rx_bd_base + pinfo->rx_nrfifos;
> /*The above line sh
I find a problem in
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c:
int cpm_uart_allocbuf(struct uart_cpm_port *pinfo, unsigned int is_con)
{
... ...
pinfo->tx_bd_base = pinfo->rx_bd_base + pinfo->rx_nrfifos;
/*The above line should be ：*/
pinfo->tx_bd_base = pinfo->rx_bd_base + sizeof(cbd_t) * pinfo->
