Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:24 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
I guess that with the above dropping of non-zero based PCI IO ranges
this is not supposed to be work
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:24 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
> >> I guess that with the above dropping of non-zero based PCI IO ranges
> >> this is not supposed to be working. But does anyone know why?
>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
>> I guess that with the above dropping of non-zero based PCI IO ranges
>> this is not supposed to be working. But does anyone know why?
>
> We just fixed that for 64 bits but 32 bits still has the limitati
> Define "legacy device"? What should that entail? You mean like mapping
> most of those registers to the first couple of kilobytes of "IO"?
Anything that hard-decodes IOs in the low ISA range yes. That includes
VGA video cards.
> If they're just left as their own on their own as PCI devices, wh
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 00:38 +0100, Matt Sealey wrote:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
Hi,
Trying to change PCI IO window base for 52xx target I found that
we are pretty much limited
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 00:38 +0100, Matt Sealey wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Trying to change PCI IO window base for 52xx target I found that
> >> we are pretty much limited to a "0" offset only.
> >
> > We
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to change PCI IO window base for 52xx target I found that
>> we are pretty much limited to a "0" offset only.
>
> We just fixed that for 64 bits but 32 bits still has the limitation.
>
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to change PCI IO window base for 52xx target I found that
> we are pretty much limited to a "0" offset only.
>
> pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges() will not process any IO range that has
> addresses set to anything else.
>
Hi,
Trying to change PCI IO window base for 52xx target I found that
we are pretty much limited to a "0" offset only.
pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges() will not process any IO range that has
addresses set to anything else.
956: case 1: /* I/O space */
957: if (ranges[2]
