On Fri, 2010-03-09 at 10:05 +0300, Ioannis Kokkoris wrote:
> We are using a board revision 2 (pilot version). Our main concern is whether
> this issue affects the working UCC1 eth interface performance.
No, it won't affect the performance. We got line rate for performance
for UECs on this board.
> Subject: RE: P1021MDS QE Ethernet Ports
> From: haiying.w...@freescale.com
> To: johnko...@hotmail.com
> CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:32:48 -0400
>
> On Thu, 2010-02-09 at 11:26 +0300, Ioannis Kokkoris wrote:
>>> From: johnko...@ho
On Thu, 2010-02-09 at 11:26 +0300, Ioannis Kokkoris wrote:
> > From: johnko...@hotmail.com
> > To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: P1021MDS QE Ethernet Ports
> > Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:11:56 +0300
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > we a
> From: johnko...@hotmail.com
> To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: P1021MDS QE Ethernet Ports
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:11:56 +0300
>
>
> Hello,
>
> we are seeing a strange behavior when trying to use the QE Ethernet
> interfaces.
> ENET5 (UCC5 - R
Hello,
we are seeing a strange behavior when trying to use the QE Ethernet interfaces.
ENET5 (UCC5 - RMII) interface on P1021MDS boards does not come up if there is
no physical link on the ENET1 (UCC1 - MII) Port.
It seems that interrupts from ENET5 are normally received but the link comes up
a
