On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:57 +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
> Thnx for the suggestion, but the ide_insw is in fact of copy of the
> _insw assembly routine, and it gets passed
> the effective address, without the _IO_BASE offset.
>
> I was thinking about TLB stuff. I'm not a u-boot expert, but could it
2009/9/15 Benjamin Herrenschmidt :
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 15:08 +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
>> 2009/9/14 Josh Boyer :
>> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
>> >>Hi,
>> >>
>> >>we're working with a PPC440GX on a board that has a.o. a compact flash
>> >>slot.
>> >>We had
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 15:08 +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
> 2009/9/14 Josh Boyer :
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>we're working with a PPC440GX on a board that has a.o. a compact flash slot.
> >>We had the PCI subsystem of the ppc disabled in strappi
2009/9/14 Josh Boyer :
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>we're working with a PPC440GX on a board that has a.o. a compact flash slot.
>>We had the PCI subsystem of the ppc disabled in strapping for quite a while,
>>until we wanted to start using it.
>>Howeve
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:36:15PM +0200, Ludo Van Put wrote:
>Hi,
>
>we're working with a PPC440GX on a board that has a.o. a compact flash slot.
>We had the PCI subsystem of the ppc disabled in strapping for quite a while,
>until we wanted to start using it.
>However, when we enabled PCI in the s
Hi,
we're working with a PPC440GX on a board that has a.o. a compact flash slot.
We had the PCI subsystem of the ppc disabled in strapping for quite a while,
until we wanted to start using it.
However, when we enabled PCI in the strapping and in the (patched 2.6.10)
kernel configuration, we trigge
