>> AFAIK, NAND flash is autodetected by reading it's ID at runtime, so
>> there should be no need for flash bindings.
>
> Well, I'm not really sure. CFI and JEDEC can both be probed as well,
> and we're working on a binding there.
JEDEC cannot be reliably probed. CFI can be _almost_ probed,
you
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:30:08 +0400
Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, NAND flash is autodetected by reading it's ID at runtime, so
> there should be no need for flash bindings.
Well, I'm not really sure. CFI and JEDEC can both be probed as well,
and we're working on a binding
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:06:03 +0200
> Segher Boessenkool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Is anybody working on the device-tree-aware ppc 44x NAND flash
controller (ndfc) driver?
>>> Not to my knowledge. We sort of need a decent binding for NAND flash
>>> in general firs
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:06:03 +0200
Segher Boessenkool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is anybody working on the device-tree-aware ppc 44x NAND flash
> >> controller (ndfc) driver?
> >
> > Not to my knowledge. We sort of need a decent binding for NAND flash
> > in general first.
>
> Not really.
>> Is anybody working on the device-tree-aware ppc 44x NAND flash
>> controller (ndfc) driver?
>
> Not to my knowledge. We sort of need a decent binding for NAND flash
> in general first.
Not really. You can put the NAND controller in the device
tree without describing the NAND flash itself --
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:17:03 +0400
Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anybody working on the device-tree-aware ppc 44x NAND flash controller
> (ndfc) driver?
Not to my knowledge. We sort of need a decent binding for NAND flash
in general first. And David's recent flash binding d
Is anybody working on the device-tree-aware ppc 44x NAND flash controller
(ndfc) driver?
Thanks,
Valentine.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
