Hi!
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:39:22PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Adhemerval Zanella's message of April 27, 2020 11:09 pm:
> >> Right, I'm just talking about those comments -- it seems like the kernel
> >> vdso should contain an .opd section with function descriptors in it for
Rich Felker writes:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 08:56:54PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> >> The ELF v2 ABI convention would suit it well, because the caller already
>> >> requires the function address for ctr, so having it in r12 will
>> >> eliminate the need for address calculation, which suits
On 28/04/2020 23:39, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Adhemerval Zanella's message of April 27, 2020 11:09 pm:
>>
>>
>> On 26/04/2020 00:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Rich Felker's message of April 26, 2020 9:11 am:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:58:19AM +1000, Nicholas Pig
Excerpts from Adhemerval Zanella's message of April 27, 2020 11:09 pm:
>
>
> On 26/04/2020 00:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Excerpts from Rich Felker's message of April 26, 2020 9:11 am:
>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:58:19AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's mes
On 26/04/2020 00:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Rich Felker's message of April 26, 2020 9:11 am:
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:58:19AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 10:20 pm:
Le 25/04/2020 à 12:56, Nicholas
Excerpts from Rich Felker's message of April 26, 2020 9:11 am:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:58:19AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 10:20 pm:
>> >
>> >
>> > Le 25/04/2020 à 12:56, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> >> Excerpts from Christophe
Excerpts from Rich Felker's message of April 26, 2020 2:22 am:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 08:56:54PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> >> The ELF v2 ABI convention would suit it well, because the caller already
>> >> requires the function address for ctr, so having it in r12 will
>> >> eliminate the
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:58:19AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 10:20 pm:
> >
> >
> > Le 25/04/2020 à 12:56, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> >> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 5:47 pm:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Le 25/04/
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 10:20 pm:
>
>
> Le 25/04/2020 à 12:56, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 5:47 pm:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 25/04/2020 à 07:22, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
As noted in the 'scv' thread, powerp
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 08:56:54PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> >> The ELF v2 ABI convention would suit it well, because the caller already
> >> requires the function address for ctr, so having it in r12 will
> >> eliminate the need for address calculation, which suits the vdso data
> >> page ac
Le 25/04/2020 à 12:56, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 5:47 pm:
Le 25/04/2020 à 07:22, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
As noted in the 'scv' thread, powerpc's vdso calling convention does not
match the C ELF ABI calling convention (or the prop
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of April 25, 2020 5:47 pm:
>
>
> Le 25/04/2020 à 07:22, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> As noted in the 'scv' thread, powerpc's vdso calling convention does not
>> match the C ELF ABI calling convention (or the proposed scv convention).
>> I think we could im
Le 25/04/2020 à 07:22, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
As noted in the 'scv' thread, powerpc's vdso calling convention does not
match the C ELF ABI calling convention (or the proposed scv convention).
I think we could implement a new ABI by basically duplicating function
entry points with different
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 03:22:27PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> As noted in the 'scv' thread, powerpc's vdso calling convention does not
> match the C ELF ABI calling convention (or the proposed scv convention).
> I think we could implement a new ABI by basically duplicating function
> entry po
As noted in the 'scv' thread, powerpc's vdso calling convention does not
match the C ELF ABI calling convention (or the proposed scv convention).
I think we could implement a new ABI by basically duplicating function
entry points with different names.
The ELF v2 ABI convention would suit it well,
15 matches
Mail list logo
