On 11/26/18 8:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this
too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...)
A
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this
> > too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...)
>
> Ah, yes, you may be right. everyo
Hi Kees,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this
> > too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...)
>
> Ah, yes, you may be right. every
Hi Kees,
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 21:46:20 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> Excellent! (Though, wait, does this mean everyone _else_ will see this
> too? I'm worried that will be way too noisy...)
Ah, yes, you may be right. everyone will see them :-(
I may have to figure out another way to do this for to
Hi Kees,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:34:33 +0100 Kees Cook wrote:
>
> So, if you it's possible to "seed" some new flags for linux-next, I'd
> be interested in making sure no new instances of warnings from
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough (gcc 7.1 and later) appear. VLAs will be gone
> in a couple days, so I'm
