On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 09:45 -0700, wael showair wrote:
>
> wael showair wrote:
> >
> >> > You cannot really rely on getting the exact same number of edge
> >> > interrupts that were emitted. At least not unless you have a hard RT
> >> > system and can guarantee that you'll always dequeue them fas
ver- rely on edge interrupts in ways that
> require them not to be coalesced.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>> >So you don't need to worry too much about racing with new incoming
>> messages inside the
>> > interrupt handler itself. But you need to be prepared to pick up
> > interrupt handler itself. But you need to be prepared to pick up more
> > than one item of work... whatever that is.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ben.
> >
> > _______
> > Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> > Linuxppc-dev
epared to pick up more
> than one item of work... whatever that is.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> ___
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
--
View
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 06:17 -0700, wael showair wrote:
> Hi All,
> i have a freescale board, that contains MPC8555 processor & DSP-core
> there is a GPIO connecting the DSP-core into an input pin of the OpenPIC of
> the MPC8555 processor.
>
> i test one interrupt from the DSP-core to the MPC8555 p
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM, wael showair wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> i have a freescale board, that contains MPC8555 processor & DSP-core
>> there is a GPIO connecting the DSP-core into an input pin of the OpenPIC of
>> the MPC8555 processor.
>>
>>
th interrupts disabled. A printk() takes 1.5ms
on a mpc5200.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Missing-some-interrupts-tp23901807p23901807.html
> Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __
terrupt just only twice.
do u have any suggestions to solve this problem?
i want to make sure that i can receive 10 interrupts
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Missing-some-interrupts-tp23901807p23901807.html
Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list arch
