Re: [resend] Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information

2010-02-01 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:52 PM, David Gibson wrote: > Grant, I've updated this for your current test-devicetree branch. > Please apply. > > Currently when processing flattened device trees, the kernel expects > the phandle in a property called "linux,phandle".  The ePAPR spec - > not being Linux

Re: [resend] Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:52:42PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > Grant, I've updated this for your current test-devicetree branch. > Please apply. > > Currently when processing flattened device trees, the kernel expects > the phandle in a property called "linux,phandle". The ePAPR spec - > not bei

[resend] Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information

2010-01-31 Thread David Gibson
Grant, I've updated this for your current test-devicetree branch. Please apply. Currently when processing flattened device trees, the kernel expects the phandle in a property called "linux,phandle". The ePAPR spec - not being Linux specific - instead requires phandles to be encoded in a property

Re: Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information

2009-11-25 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:16 PM, David Gibson wrote: > Grant, this is based on your test-devicetree branch, if it could be > merged via there would be great. > > Currently when processing flattened device trees, the kernel expects > the phandle in a property called "linux,phandle".  The ePAPR spe

Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information

2009-11-25 Thread David Gibson
Grant, this is based on your test-devicetree branch, if it could be merged via there would be great. Currently when processing flattened device trees, the kernel expects the phandle in a property called "linux,phandle". The ePAPR spec - not being Linux specific - instead requires phandles to be e