Re: Machine check in 4xx ethernet driver

2009-03-09 Thread Felix Radensky
ee yet this morning. > > You'll need to look at the code path ethtool is forcing. Perhaps it's > doing > something stupid. > > Bad quoting in previous message, sorry. The problem goes away if I replace memcpy_fromio() by memcpy()., but register values seem wrong.

Re: Machine check in 4xx ethernet driver

2009-03-09 Thread Felix Radensky
fee yet this morning. > > You'll need to look at the code path ethtool is forcing. Perhaps it's > doing > something stupid. > > The problem goes away if I replace memcpy_fromio() by memcpy(). > Is memcpy_fromio() really necessary in this case ? > > -- Vie

Re: Machine check in 4xx ethernet driver

2009-03-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:53:25AM -0700, Felix Radensky wrote: > > > >Josh Boyer-4 wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:47:02AM -0700, Felix Radensky wrote: >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I'm getting machine check exception when trying to dump >>>emac registers on 405EX Kilauea board. The kernel is 2.6.29-

Re: Machine check in 4xx ethernet driver

2009-03-09 Thread Felix Radensky
IO space. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Machine-check-in-4xx-ethernet-driver-tp22408005p22410889.html Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: Machine check in 4xx ethernet driver

2009-03-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:47:02AM -0700, Felix Radensky wrote: > >Hi, > >I'm getting machine check exception when trying to dump >emac registers on 405EX Kilauea board. The kernel is 2.6.29-rc7 >The problem seems not new, I can reproduce it on 2.6.25 Denx kernel I've not looked at what that code

Machine check in 4xx ethernet driver

2009-03-09 Thread Felix Radensky
9803> 7c0006ac 38840001 38630001 ---[ end trace 075752cbf5bce2a1 ]--- Bus error Felix. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Machine-check-in-4xx-ethernet-driver-tp22408005p22408005.html Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list