On Aug 2, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:14:31AM +0800, Liu Dave-r63238 wrote:
>>> MBAR doesn't live up to its name. It's a general-purpose scratch
>>> register - the hardware doesn't do anything with it. So, wrt
>
> That doesn't mean there isn't value in sett
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:14:31AM +0800, Liu Dave-r63238 wrote:
> > MBAR doesn't live up to its name. It's a general-purpose scratch
> > register - the hardware doesn't do anything with it. So, wrt
That doesn't mean there isn't value in setting it, so code can easily
find the IMMR without havi
07 9:15 PM
To: Phillips Kim-R1AAHA; Keith Mund
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] MPC83xx - previous patch to set MBAR
> > The end result simply adds a line to set MBAR to match IMMRBAR.
> >
> > lis r3, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> &
> > The end result simply adds a line to set MBAR to match IMMRBAR.
> >
> > lis r3, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ori r3, r3, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > stw r3, IMMRBAR(r4)
> > + mtspr MBAR, r3
> >
> > Are these patches routinely added to the mainstream u-boot code?
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:20:22 -0500
"Keith Mund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a u-boot 1.1.3 patch for start.S posted on the Freescale LTIB
posts concerning u-boot should go to the u-boot-users list (cc'd).
> site:
> http://www.bitshrine.org/gpp/u-boot-1.1.3-mpc83xx-cpu-4.patch
>
> The
There was a u-boot 1.1.3 patch for start.S posted on the Freescale LTIB
site:
http://www.bitshrine.org/gpp/u-boot-1.1.3-mpc83xx-cpu-4.patch
The end result simply adds a line to set MBAR to match IMMRBAR.
lis r3, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ori r3, r3, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stw
