Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:12:35AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Timur Tabi writes: > > > Is this a new policy? Modules in the kernel are not built unless you want > > them. Even in arch/powerpc/platforms, only the specific platform file I'm > > targeting is built. So I don't really understa

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-10 Thread Paul Mackerras
Timur Tabi writes: > Is this a new policy? Modules in the kernel are not built unless you want > them. Even in arch/powerpc/platforms, only the specific platform file I'm > targeting is built. So I don't really understand why you claim it's normal > for platform-specific files to be built, r

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-09 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:06:05AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > > Policy. Compiling everything means build bugs - like this one - can > > be found by everybody, not just those building for the specific > > obscure platform. > > Is this a new policy? Modules in the kernel a

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-09 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:07:29PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:33:24PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > > > Question: I'm building a kernel for the 8610. Why is treeboot-walnut.c > > > being compiled at all? > >

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 9, 2007, at 1:52 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:06:05 -0500 > Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> David Gibson wrote: >> >>> Policy. Compiling everything means build bugs - like this one - can >>> be found by everybody, not just those building for the specific >>> o

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:06:05 -0500 Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > > Policy. Compiling everything means build bugs - like this one - can > > be found by everybody, not just those building for the specific > > obscure platform. > > Is this a new policy? Modules i

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-09 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:07:29PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:33:24PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > > Question: I'm building a kernel for the 8610. Why is treeboot-walnut.c > > being compiled at all? > > Policy. Compiling everything means build bugs - like this one - ca

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-09 Thread Timur Tabi
David Gibson wrote: > Policy. Compiling everything means build bugs - like this one - can > be found by everybody, not just those building for the specific > obscure platform. Is this a new policy? Modules in the kernel are not built unless you want them. Even in arch/powerpc/platforms, only

Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg

2007-10-08 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:33:24PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Looks like the problem is back: > >BOOTCC arch/powerpc/boot/treeboot-walnut.o > Assembler messages: > Error: Internal assembler error for instruction icbt > Internal error, aborting at > /tmp/crosstool/crosstool-0.42/build/powerpc