On 18.06.14 17:33, Adrian Cox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Zigotzky"
Christian
But my opinion is, that's normal for the SB600 south bridge to
presents itself as multiple devices on the PCIe bus on x86 PCs. I
see
a lot of PCs with SB600 south bridge on the internet. An
Am 18.06.14 10:57, schrieb Christian Zigotzky:
Am 18.06.14 08:51, schrieb Michael Ellerman:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:20 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi All,
Could you help me to remove the changes of the PCI code, please? Or
which patches shall I remove to get the old PCI code?
Hi Christi
Am 18.06.14 08:51, schrieb Michael Ellerman:
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:20 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi All,
Could you help me to remove the changes of the PCI code, please? Or
which patches shall I remove to get the old PCI code?
Hi Christian,
Thanks for doing the bisect. It wasn't clea
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:20 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Could you help me to remove the changes of the PCI code, please? Or
> which patches shall I remove to get the old PCI code?
Hi Christian,
Thanks for doing the bisect. It wasn't clear why that change was causing your
issu
Hi All,
Could you help me to remove the changes of the PCI code, please? Or
which patches shall I remove to get the old PCI code?
Cheers,
Christian
Am 10.06.14 12:58, schrieb Christian Zigotzky:
Hi Michael,
I have two times bisected with git. It seems the commit "PCI: Remove
pci_find_pare
Hi Michael,
I have two times bisected with git. It seems the commit "PCI: Remove
pci_find_parent_resource() use for allocation" is the problem. I have
removed this patch from the kernel source code but unfortunately the
kernel doesn't boot. Have you another tip for me, please?
Cheers,
Chris
On 31.05.2014 13:01, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 31.05.2014 12:28, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 29.05.2014 04:48, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:25 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 28.05.2014 10:53, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your answer and tha
On 31.05.2014 12:28, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 29.05.2014 04:48, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:25 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 28.05.2014 10:53, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your answer and thank you for your help. :-)
On 28.05.2014 06:23,
On 29.05.2014 04:48, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:25 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
On 28.05.2014 10:53, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your answer and thank you for your help. :-)
On 28.05.2014 06:23, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 0
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:25 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 28.05.2014 10:53, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Thank you for your answer and thank you for your help. :-)
> >
> > On 28.05.2014 06:23, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 01:08 +0200, Christian Zig
On 28.05.2014 10:53, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your answer and thank you for your help. :-)
On 28.05.2014 06:23, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 01:08 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
...
18a1a7a1d862ae0794a0
Hi Michael,
Thank you for your answer and thank you for your help. :-)
On 28.05.2014 06:23, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 01:08 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
...
18a1a7a1d862ae0794a0179473d08a414dd49234 <- It doesn't boot. Error m
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 01:08 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks a lot for your answer.
>
> ...
>
> 18a1a7a1d862ae0794a0179473d08a414dd49234 <- It doesn't boot. Error messages:
> Oops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 not tainted
> d8ff9cdf68fd119d491
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
On 26.05.2014 14:26, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Christian,
I'm almost certain that is not the commit which breaks your machine. Or if it
is, something *really* weird is going on.
The code changed in that commit should never run on a PA6T.
You're rig
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 14:06 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 05.05.2014 07:48, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:02 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> The RC 1, 2, and 3 of the kernel 3.15 don't boot on my PA6T board with a
> >> Radeon HD 6870 graphics c
On 05.05.2014 07:48, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:02 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi All,
The RC 1, 2, and 3 of the kernel 3.15 don't boot on my PA6T board with a
Radeon HD 6870 graphics card.
Screenshot:
http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/download/file.php?id=1060
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for your answer. They reasoned that "starting cpu hw idx
0... failed" is reported because that core of the CPU is already up and
running.
I have built a git kernel from 2014-04-02.
-> git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git linux-g
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:02 +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The RC 1, 2, and 3 of the kernel 3.15 don't boot on my PA6T board with a
> Radeon HD 6870 graphics card.
>
> Screenshot:
> http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/download/file.php?id=1060&mode=view
>
> The kernel 3.14
Hi All,
The RC 1, 2, and 3 of the kernel 3.15 don't boot on my PA6T board with a
Radeon HD 6870 graphics card.
Screenshot:
http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/download/file.php?id=1060&mode=view
The kernel 3.14 starts without any problems. Has anyone a tip for me,
please?
Cheers,
Ch
19 matches
Mail list logo
