On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
[...]
> hmm, this looks promising. Can I write my own board-specific-csm
> and attach it to the SPI CS engine?
Yes, you'd able to do it, but there is no such thing as SPI CS
engine, yet.
See the two options of how we can implement
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 04/08/2009 16:22:50:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >But any users of the legacy bind
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree.
> > >
> > > ehh, it was working until
Anton Vorontsov wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> [...]
> > >But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree.
> >
> > ehh, it was working until you made it OF only. Why do call the native
> > way legacy? It is the method a
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
[...]
> >But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree.
>
> ehh, it was working until you made it OF only. Why do call the native
> way legacy? It is the method all non OF arch uses.
It's legacy because there are no in-tr
-Anton Vorontsov skrev: -
>Till: Joakim Tjernlund
>Från: Anton Vorontsov
>Datum: 07/14/2009 00:20
>Kopia: David Brownell ,
>linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
>Ärende: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:59:54PM +0200, Joakim T
