On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:05:21PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 3/17/21 12:30 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 3/17/21 2:00 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Patch 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask")
> > > introduced
> >
On 3/18/21 10:42 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
* Daniel Henrique Barboza [2021-03-17 10:00:34]:
Hello,
Patch 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask") introduced
a regression in both upstream and RHEL downstream kernels [1]. The assumption
made
in the commit:
"Furthe
* Daniel Henrique Barboza [2021-03-17 10:00:34]:
> Hello,
>
> Patch 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask")
> introduced
> a regression in both upstream and RHEL downstream kernels [1]. The assumption
> made
> in the commit:
>
> "Further analysis shows that cpu_core_ma
On 3/17/21 12:30 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/17/21 2:00 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hello,
Patch 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask") introduced
a regression in both upstream and RHEL downstream kernels [1]. The assumption
made
in the commit:
"Further
On 3/17/21 2:00 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patch 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask")
> introduced
> a regression in both upstream and RHEL downstream kernels [1]. The assumption
> made
> in the commit:
>
> "Further analysis shows that cpu_core_ma
Hello,
Patch 4bce545903fa ("powerpc/topology: Update topology_core_cpumask") introduced
a regression in both upstream and RHEL downstream kernels [1]. The assumption
made
in the commit:
"Further analysis shows that cpu_core_mask and cpu_cpu_mask for any CPU would be
equal on Power"
Doesn't see