Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:11:06 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton writes: > > > a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and > > That would be h8300-kallsyms-exclude-local-symbols.patch, which > excludes symbols starting with '.' on all architectures, despite the

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

Andrew Morton writes: > a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and That would be h8300-kallsyms-exclude-local-symbols.patch, which excludes symbols starting with '.' on all architectures, despite the name of the patch. Paul. ___ Linuxppc-dev ma

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

> > > A 64-bit binary on a 64-bit machine Should Just Work. Maybe that's > > > me being simplistic. > > > > But is it a 64 bits binary ? > > > > vmlinux? Yup. According to file(1). No, I'm talking about gdb :-0 IE. If it's a 32 bits gdb variant that cannot do 64 bits.. then it's stuffed.

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:36:41 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:42:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:36:41 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:42:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is stupid: > > > > > > > > g5:/usr

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 21:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:54:22 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and > > > > > > b) someone screwed up their procfs handling. > > > > I think the proc bug is ol

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:42:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > This is stupid: > > > > > > g5:/usr/src/25> gdb vmlinux > > > GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.21rh) > > > Copyright 2004 Free Software Fo

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:54:22 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and > > > > b) someone screwed up their procfs handling. > > I think the proc bug is old, might have to do with /proc/bus/pci... > I have that on my G5 too wi

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

> a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and > > b) someone screwed up their procfs handling. I think the proc bug is old, might have to do with /proc/bus/pci... I have that on my G5 too with 2.6.26, I think I just forgot about it.. Care to give that untested patch a try ? powerpc: Alw

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:42:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is stupid: > > > > g5:/usr/src/25> gdb vmlinux > > GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.21rh) > > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public

Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

> This is stupid: > > g5:/usr/src/25> gdb vmlinux > GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.21rh) > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.

2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace

Booting the putative 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 lineup on the g5 I see: io scheduler cfq registered proc_dir_entry '00' already registered Call Trace: [c0017a0fbae0] [c0012540] unrecov_restore+0x98d8/0x1220c (unreliable) [c0017a0fbb90] [c0149798] dst_error+0x117d3c/0x42ba04 [c001