Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-06 Thread Segher Boessenkool
>> It seems like things go wrong when lparmap.s is generated with >> (DWARF) debug info; could you try building it (manually) with -g0 >> added on the end of the compile line, and see if head_64.o compiles >> okay for you then? If so, I'll prepare a proper patch for it, I >> have a similar one (al

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-06 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
> >>> Second issue as reported earilier allmodconfig fails to build on imac > >>> g3. > >>> > >>> CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s > >>> AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o > >>> lparmap.c: Assembler messages: > >>> lparmap.c:84: Error: file number 1 already allocated > >>> make[1]: ***

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-06 Thread Segher Boessenkool
>>> Second issue as reported earilier allmodconfig fails to build on imac >>> g3. >>> >>> CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s >>> AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o >>> lparmap.c: Assembler messages: >>> lparmap.c:84: Error: file number 1 already allocated >>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/ke

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-06 Thread Segher Boessenkool
> Some how your defconfig is targeting a PPC64 box: > > CONFIG_PPC64=y > > shouldn't be set if you want to build a kernel for a G3 imac. allyesconfig/allmodconfig select a 64-bit build always. Maybe it shouldn't. Segher ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-06 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On 2 aug 2007, at 12:14, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: >>> Second issue as reported earilier allmodconfig fails to build on >>> imac g3. >> >> Do you really mean g3? If so it's a 32-bit kernel and it shouldn't be >> building lparmap.s. It might be a bug nevertheless, there are more "issues" with th

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-06 Thread Segher Boessenkool
> Second issue as reported earilier allmodconfig fails to build on imac > g3. > > CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s > AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o > lparmap.c: Assembler messages: > lparmap.c:84: Error: file number 1 already allocated > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o]

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-03 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 2, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: >>> Second issue as reported earilier allmodconfig fails to build on >>> imac g3. >> >> Do you really mean g3? If so it's a 32-bit kernel and it >> shouldn't be >> building lparmap.s. Or do you mean G5? > > Yes it is iMac G3. More or less

Re: build error on powerpc for 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:52:05 +0530 Rishikesh K Rajak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > I am getting following error on powerpc almost for allyesconfig, > allmodconfig. > > Error produced: > > PowerPC: allmodconfig,allyesconfig > > CC arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_64.o > /home/risrajak

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-01 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:02:30AM +0200, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > Then reattaching a usb mouse caused this (only once) > > usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2 > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > [] dump_stack+0x15/0x17 > [] __free

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-01 Thread Paul Mackerras
Mariusz Kozlowski writes: > Second issue as reported earilier allmodconfig fails to build on imac g3. Do you really mean g3? If so it's a 32-bit kernel and it shouldn't be building lparmap.s. Or do you mean G5? > CC arch/powerpc/kernel/lparmap.s > AS arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:02:30 +0200 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I get this warning. Looking at the comment in kernel/irq/resend.c > > it's harmless. Is it? yeah, harmless. Ingo ___

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:02:30 +0200 Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I get this warning. Looking at the comment in kernel/irq/resend.c > it's harmless. Is it? > > WARNING: at kernel/irq/resend.c:69 check_irq_resend() > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 > [] show_trac

Re: 2.6.23-rc1-mm2

2007-08-01 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I get this warning. Looking at the comment in kernel/irq/resend.c it's harmless. Is it? WARNING: at kernel/irq/resend.c:69 check_irq_resend() [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 [] dump_stack+0x15/0x17 [] check_irq_resend+0x91/0xa0 [] enable_irq+0xb1/0xb3