On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 21:07 +0100, christophe leroy wrote:
> Le 08/11/2014 01:08, Scott Wood a écrit :
> >
> > OK, so the _PAGE_KERNEL_RO(X) stuff is because initially setting the PTE
> > doesn't go through pte_update().
> >
> > I'll apply this, though it'd be cleaner to just have 8xx versions of t
Le 08/11/2014 01:08, Scott Wood a écrit :
OK, so the _PAGE_KERNEL_RO(X) stuff is because initially setting the PTE
doesn't go through pte_update().
I'll apply this, though it'd be cleaner to just have 8xx versions of the
relevant PTE accessor functions to maintain the PTE the way the hardware
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 09:00 +0100, leroy christophe wrote:
> Le 07/11/2014 04:37, Scott Wood a écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:36:09AM +0200, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> >> No need to re-set this bit at each TLB miss. Let's set it in the PTE.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
> >> ---
Le 07/11/2014 04:37, Scott Wood a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:36:09AM +0200, LEROY Christophe wrote:
No need to re-set this bit at each TLB miss. Let's set it in the PTE.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
Changes in v2:
- None
Changes in v3:
- Removed PPC405 related macro from PPC8x
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:36:09AM +0200, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> No need to re-set this bit at each TLB miss. Let's set it in the PTE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - None
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Removed PPC405 related macro from PPC8xx specific code
> - PTE_NONE
