Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses

2008-05-24 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 23 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > Very good point.  Okay, so we cannot assume any correlation between > the number of CS lines and the number of child nodes to the SPI bus. That wasn't what I was implying ... all the devices hooked up to a given chipselect should be viewed as a single (

Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses

2008-05-23 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:26 PM, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: >> > spi-controller { >> >#address-cells = 2; >> >#size-cells = 0; >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED],f000 { reg = < 0 f000 >; } // CS 0, SPI address >> > f000 >> >

Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses

2008-05-22 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > > spi-controller { > >        #address-cells = 2; > >        #size-cells = 0; > >       [EMAIL PROTECTED],f000 { reg = < 0 f000 >; } // CS 0, SPI address f000 > >       [EMAIL PROTECTED],f000 { reg = < 1 f000 >; } // CS 1, SPI address f000 > >       [