Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem

2008-06-02 Thread Geoff Levand
Geoff Levand wrote: > Alessandro Zummo wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600 >> Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely >>> handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc? >>> >>> I ask for two reasons: >>> 1. shou

Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem

2008-05-30 Thread Geoff Levand
Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600 > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely >> handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc? >> >> I ask for two reasons: >> 1. should we make it mutually exclusiv

Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem

2008-02-20 Thread woodys
Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600 > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely >> handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc? >> >> I ask for two reasons: >> 1. should we make it mutually exclusive

Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem

2008-02-20 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely > handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc? > > I ask for two reasons: > 1. should we make it mutually exclusive in Kconfig > 2. I've enabled both