On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:32:22PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Nick Piggin writes:
>
> > This is an interesting one for me. AFAIKS it is possible to use lwsync for
> > a full barrier after a successful ll/sc operation, right? (or stop me here
> > if I'm wrong).
>
> An lwsync would order subseq
Nick Piggin writes:
> This is an interesting one for me. AFAIKS it is possible to use lwsync for
> a full barrier after a successful ll/sc operation, right? (or stop me here
> if I'm wrong).
An lwsync would order subsequent loads after the lwarx/ldarx, and
subsequent stores after the stcwx./stcdx
Hi guys,
This is an interesting one for me. AFAIKS it is possible to use lwsync for
a full barrier after a successful ll/sc operation, right? (or stop me here
if I'm wrong).
Anyway, I was interested in exploring this. Unfortunately my G5 might not
be very indicative of more modern, and future dev
