On Thu, 15 May 2008 19:08:37 +1000 Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:28:28 +1000 Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:28:28 +1000 Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:28:28 +1000 Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > > > -__initcall(adb_init);
> > >
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > -__initcall(adb_init);
> > > +device_initcall(adb_init);
> >
> > There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2
On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > -__initcall(adb_init);
> > +device_initcall(adb_init);
>
> There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there?
> It looks to me like something that I should queue up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> -__initcall(adb_init);
> +device_initcall(adb_init);
There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there?
It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27.
Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/macintosh/adb.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 i
