On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:44:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, npig...@suse.de wrote:
>
> > As explained in commit 1c0fe6e3bd, we want to call the architecture
> > independent
> > oom killer when getting an unexplained OOM from handle_mm_fault, rather than
> > simply killi
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, npig...@suse.de wrote:
> As explained in commit 1c0fe6e3bd, we want to call the architecture
> independent
> oom killer when getting an unexplained OOM from handle_mm_fault, rather than
> simply killing current.
>
> Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>
As explained in commit 1c0fe6e3bd, we want to call the architecture independent
oom killer when getting an unexplained OOM from handle_mm_fault, rather than
simply killing current.
Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin
--
