From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:48:02 +0300
> There was clearly supposed to be a break statement here. Currently we
> use the k2 ata timings instead of sh ata ones we intended. Probably no
> one has this hardware anymore so it likely doesn't make a difference
> beyond the static c
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 13:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There was clearly supposed to be a break statement here. Currently we
> use the k2 ata timings instead of sh ata ones we intended. Probably no
> one has this hardware anymore so it likely doesn't make a difference
> beyond the static check
There was clearly supposed to be a break statement here. Currently we
use the k2 ata timings instead of sh ata ones we intended. Probably no
one has this hardware anymore so it likely doesn't make a difference
beyond the static checker warning.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
diff --git a/drivers
