On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:52 PM Christian Marangi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 6:32 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 18:11:56 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > OK, but I suspect some users of napi_resched
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 6:32 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 18:11:56 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > OK, but I suspect some users of napi_reschedule() might not be
> > > race-free...
> >
> > What's the race you're
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 6:32 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 18:11:56 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > OK, but I suspect some users of napi_reschedule() might not be race-free...
>
> What's the race you're thinking of?
This sort of thing... the race is in fl_starving() though...
diff
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 18:11:56 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> OK, but I suspect some users of napi_reschedule() might not be race-free...
What's the race you're thinking of?
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:36 PM Christian Marangi wrote:
>
> Now that napi_schedule return a bool, we can drop napi_reschedule that
> does the same exact function. The function comes from a very old commit
> bfe13f54f502 ("ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct
> net_device") an
Now that napi_schedule return a bool, we can drop napi_reschedule that
does the same exact function. The function comes from a very old commit
bfe13f54f502 ("ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct
net_device") and the purpose is actually deprecated in favour of
different logic.
