On 06/05/2024 10.01, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:25:37AM GMT, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 04/05/2024 14.28, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware).
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:25:37AM GMT, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/05/2024 14.28, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
> > in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
> > hardware). It would be nice to count thes
On 04/05/2024 14.28, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.
xfail is not the
There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.
xfail is not the same thing, xfail means failure is required a
