On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:31:52PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu Feb 29, 2024 at 1:04 AM AEST, Andrew Jones wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/lib/stack.h b/lib/stack.h
> > index 10fc2f793354..6edc84344b51 100644
> > --- a/lib/stack.h
> > +++ b/lib/stack.h
> > @@ -11,17 +11,27 @@
> > #include
>
On Thu Feb 29, 2024 at 1:04 AM AEST, Andrew Jones wrote:
> We should never pass the result of __builtin_frame_address(0) to
> another function since the compiler is within its rights to pop the
> frame to which it points before making the function call, as may be
> done for tail calls. Nobody has c
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:04:19 +0100
Andrew Jones wrote:
> We should never pass the result of __builtin_frame_address(0) to
> another function since the compiler is within its rights to pop the
> frame to which it points before making the function call, as may be
> done for tail calls. Nobody has c
We should never pass the result of __builtin_frame_address(0) to
another function since the compiler is within its rights to pop the
frame to which it points before making the function call, as may be
done for tail calls. Nobody has complained about backtrace(), so
likely all compilations have been
