"Caitlin Bestler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13.12.2007
22:08:34:
> To clarify, an FMR Work Request is simply posted to the SendQ like
> any other Work Request (of course the QP has to be privileged, or
> it will complete in error). An SQ Post should never block.
This would require hardware su
gt; Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Serialize
> HCA-related hCalls on POWER5
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13.12.2007 20:22:49:
>
> > On Dec 13, 2007 12:30 AM, Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The current implementation of the open i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13.12.2007 20:22:49:
> On Dec 13, 2007 12:30 AM, Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The current implementation of the open iscsi initiator makes sure to
> > issue commands in thread (sleepable) context, see iscsi_xmitworker and
> > references to it in drivers/scsi
On Dec 13, 2007 12:30 AM, Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I think the right fix for iSER would be to make iSER work even for
> > devices that don't support FMRs. For example cxgb3 doesn't implement
> > FMRs so if anyone ever updates iSER to work on iWARP and not ju
Roland Dreier wrote:
> I think the right fix for iSER would be to make iSER work even for
> devices that don't support FMRs. For example cxgb3 doesn't implement
> FMRs so if anyone ever updates iSER to work on iWARP and not just IB,
> then this is something that has to be tackled anyway. Then ehc
> What is the fix you suggest, to add a device query that tells you for
> which verbs the documentation does not apply? or enhance the code of the
> map_phys_fmr verb within the ehca driver to return error if called
> from non-sleepable context?
I think the right fix for iSER would be to
Joachim Fenkes wrote:
> Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10.12.2007 22:47:37:
>> It's an optional device feature, so this should be OK
>> (although the iSER driver currently seems to depend on a device
>> supporting FMRs, which is probably going to be a problem with iWARP
>> support in t
Or Gerlitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12.12.2007 13:14:25:
> Joachim Fenkes wrote:
> > Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10.12.2007 22:47:37:
>
> >> It's an optional device feature, so this should be OK
> >> (although the iSER driver currently seems to depend on a device
> >> supporting
