> I think people are confusing source and binary packages.
>
> E.g. on Debian, the openssl source package is used to build 3 binary
> packages: openssl, libssl0.9.8, and libssl-dev. Hence to install
> applications that use libssl, you don't have to install all 3, just
> libssl0.9.8.
That make sens
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:35:48 +0100 (CET)
Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0600
> > Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If it where broken out of dtc it would be easier to pickup and pull
> > > fixes f
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0600
> Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If it where broken out of dtc it would be easier to pickup and pull
> > fixes from it. Even package it so programs can easily build it
> > standalone.
>
> That's akin to saying
Jerone Young wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:59 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0600
>> Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[big snip]
>> You still haven't explained why maintenance is harder or somehow less
>> doable by having it in the dtc repo. Maintenance is v
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:59 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0600
> Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:40:43PM -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> > > > Currently the dtc sourc
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:30:44 -0600
Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:40:43PM -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> > > Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
> > > have become
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 12:41 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:40:43PM -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> > Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
> > have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone
> > (linux kernel, cuboot)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:40:43PM -0600, Jerone Young wrote:
> Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
> have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone
> (linux kernel, cuboot) also have their own versions over libfdt. But if
> another user
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:31 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:40:43 -0600
> Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
> > have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone
> > (linux
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:40:43 -0600
Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
> have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone
> (linux kernel, cuboot) also have their own versions over libfdt. But if
Currently the dtc source code has libfdt integrated in it. This seems to
have become place for upstream libfdt changes. Now we all know everyone
(linux kernel, cuboot) also have their own versions over libfdt. But if
another userspace app wants to use libfdt , it has to copy it from the
dtc source
11 matches
Mail list logo
