On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Michael Ellerman
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
>> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
>> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc).
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, a
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, an
Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
.node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
.dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
CONFIG_OF support, and they will also need a reference to the device tree
node poin