Christophe Leroy writes:
> Le 18/05/2020 à 17:19, Rui Salvaterra a écrit :
>> Hi again, Christophe,
>>
>> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 15:03, Christophe Leroy
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you try reverting 697ece78f8f749aeea40f2711389901f0974017a ? It may
>>> have broken swap.
>>
>> Yeah, that was a good c
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 18:15, Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> Yeah I discovered recently that the way swap is implemented on powerpc
> expects RW and other important bits not be one of the 3 least
> significant bits (see __pte_to_swp_entry() )
I see, you get the swap entry by shifting the PTE right t
Hi again, Christophe,
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 15:03, Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> Can you try reverting 697ece78f8f749aeea40f2711389901f0974017a ? It may
> have broken swap.
Yeah, that was a good call. :) Linux 5.7-rc1 with the revert on top
survives the beating. I'll be happy to test a definitive
