Cliff Wickman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Arnd Bergmann and Mijo Safradin called my attention to problems with
> libnuma's read_mask() on a big-endian 64-bit machine.
>
> In testing that function I found it to be buggy on little-endian and 32-bit
> systems as well.
>
> I propose a function th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arnd Bergmann and Mijo Safradin called my attention to problems with
libnuma's read_mask() on a big-endian 64-bit machine.
In testing that function I found it to be buggy on little-endian and 32-bit
systems as well.
I propose a function that looks like the below. The patch is
On Thursday 04 December 2008, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 18:34 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The read-mask function assumes that it is running in 32-bit mode,
> > by addressing the bitmask as a series of int values, instead of
> > longs. This is broken as can easily be reprod
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 18:34 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The read-mask function assumes that it is running in 32-bit mode,
> by addressing the bitmask as a series of int values, instead of
> longs. This is broken as can easily be reproduced by running numademo
> on a bit-endian 64-bit system.
>
>
