On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 11:51 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I gave it a quick boot test, all good.
>
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc)
Thanks! Christophe was advocating for slight spin on this (not doing
the member initializing in the declaration, but dropping the
assignments that set 0):
Rick Edgecombe writes:
> Future changes will need to add a new member to struct
> vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that
> doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each field
> manually, so if new fields are added they will be unitialized and the c
Future changes will need to add a new member to struct
vm_unmapped_area_info. This would cause trouble for any call site that
doesn't initialize the struct. Currently every caller sets each field
manually, so if new fields are added they will be unitialized and the core
code parsing the struct will
