Michael Ellerman writes:
> "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" writes:
>> Please find the v2 of cma related powerpc fadump fixes.
>>
>> Patch-1 is a change in mm/cma.c to make sure we return an error if someone
>> uses
>> cma_init_reserved_mem() before the pageblock_order is initalized.
>>
>> I guess, it's
On 11.10.24 12:17, Michael Ellerman wrote:
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" writes:
Please find the v2 of cma related powerpc fadump fixes.
Patch-1 is a change in mm/cma.c to make sure we return an error if someone uses
cma_init_reserved_mem() before the pageblock_order is initalized.
I guess, it's bes
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" writes:
> Please find the v2 of cma related powerpc fadump fixes.
>
> Patch-1 is a change in mm/cma.c to make sure we return an error if someone
> uses
> cma_init_reserved_mem() before the pageblock_order is initalized.
>
> I guess, it's best if Patch-1 goes via mm tree and
Please find the v2 of cma related powerpc fadump fixes.
Patch-1 is a change in mm/cma.c to make sure we return an error if someone uses
cma_init_reserved_mem() before the pageblock_order is initalized.
I guess, it's best if Patch-1 goes via mm tree and since rest of the changes
are powerpc fadump
