> On Jan 10, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>
>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:31 AM Christophe Leroy
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In order to simplify next step which moves fallback call at arch
>>> level, ensure all arches have a 32bit fallback instead of handl
Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:31 AM Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
>>
>> In order to simplify next step which moves fallback call at arch
>> level, ensure all arches have a 32bit fallback instead of handling
>> the lack of 32bit fallback in the common code based
>> on VDSO_HAS_3
Le 02/01/2020 à 12:29, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:27 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
+static __always_inline
+long clock_getres32_fallback(clockid_t _clkid, struct old_timespec32 *_ts)
+{
+ struct __kernel_timesp
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:27 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
> > +static __always_inline
> > +long clock_getres32_fallback(clockid_t _clkid, struct old_timespec32 *_ts)
> > +{
> > + struct __kernel_timespec ts;
> > + int ret = clock
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> In order to simplify next step which moves fallback call at arch
> level, ensure all arches have a 32bit fallback instead of handling
> the lack of 32bit fallback in the common code based
> on VDSO_HAS_32BIT_FALLBACK
>
> Signed-off-by: Ch
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:31 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> In order to simplify next step which moves fallback call at arch
> level, ensure all arches have a 32bit fallback instead of handling
> the lack of 32bit fallback in the common code based
> on VDSO_HAS_32BIT_FALLBACK
I don't like this.
In order to simplify next step which moves fallback call at arch
level, ensure all arches have a 32bit fallback instead of handling
the lack of 32bit fallback in the common code based
on VDSO_HAS_32BIT_FALLBACK
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
arch/arm/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h
