Hi Zi Yan,
On 2021/12/10 07:04, Zi Yan wrote:
From: Zi Yan
Hi all,
This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement for CMA
and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcoming changes to make MAX_ORDER
adjustable at boot time[1].
The MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement
On 10 Dec 2021, at 13:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.12.21 00:04, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Zi Yan
>>
>> Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for working on that!
>
>>
>> This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement for CMA
>> and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcomin
On 10.12.21 00:04, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan
>
> Hi all,
Hi,
thanks for working on that!
>
> This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement for CMA
> and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcoming changes to make
> MAX_ORDER
> adjustable at boot time[1].
>
>
On 10 Dec 2021, at 2:30, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi Zi Yan,
>
> On 2021/12/10 07:04, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Zi Yan
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement for CMA
>> and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcoming changes to make
>> MAX_ORDER
>>
From: Zi Yan
Hi all,
This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement for CMA
and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcoming changes to make MAX_ORDER
adjustable at boot time[1].
The MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement comes from that alloc_contig_range()
isolates pa