Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> Can we take out the dependencies and the default y, and just select them
>> in the individual board configs?
>
> Yeah. That and, shouldn't those choices be mutually
> exclusive in a "choice" arrangement instead too?
No, "choice" sucks for multiplatform.
-Scott
__
So, like, the other day Scott Wood mumbled:
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig
> > @@ -16,6 +16,17 @@ config LINKSTATION
> > Linkstation-I HD-HLAN and HD-HGLAN versions, and PPC-based
> > Terastation systems should
Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Use cuImage bootwrapper until U-Boot port is completed.
> Derived heavily from Linkstation port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Nope, I have NOT verified that the bd_t file that
> is used here by
So, like, the other day "Grant Likely" mumbled:
>
> Curious; why in platforms/embedded6xx vs platforms/82xx?
82xx is nominally the _other_ 82xx family. :-)
This is just more historical precedent, and the fact
that it is similar to the linkstation there.
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MPC7448HPC2) += mpc
On 1/7/08, Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Use cuImage bootwrapper until U-Boot port is completed.
> Derived heavily from Linkstation port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/
Use cuImage bootwrapper until U-Boot port is completed.
Derived heavily from Linkstation port.
Signed-off-by: Andy Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Nope, I have NOT verified that the bd_t file that
is used here byte-identical to U-Boot's layout yet.
